Memo Casino Sister Sites

Only two casinos are name-confirmed under the same operator as Memo Casino: Kinghills and Xtraspin, both tied to IntellogixSoft B.V. (Curaçao reg. 164650). A wider ring of brands (Nine, NineWin, Jokabet, CryptoLeo, BDMBet, BetOnRed, Wbetz) share the same platform look and feel, but shared design is not proof of shared ownership. Here is what I could actually verify, and what stays a guess.

I went into this expecting a tidy family tree. I did not get one. When I cross-checked the operator name on Memo's own Terms against the network lists that affiliate directories publish, the confirmed circle shrank fast.

What a "sister site" actually means

A sister site is a casino run by the same company, or on the same underlying B2B platform, as another one. Same operator, same payment processor, often the same Terms & Conditions with the clause numbers barely changed. When you have played one, you have basically read the fine print for all of them.

The messy version of that idea, the one that dominates casino directories, lumps together anything that looks alike. Same bonus structure, same login screen, same support widget in the corner. Similar is not the same as related, and this is where most "Memo Casino sister sites" lists fall apart. Two things get conflated constantly:

• Same owner. One legal operator behind both brands. This is what matters for your money, because complaints and payout behaviour tend to travel together.
• Same platform. A shared white-label engine that many separate operators rent. The sites look like twins and behave like cousins, but a different company holds your account.

The confirmed pair: Kinghills and Xtraspin

Memo Casino is operated by IntellogixSoft B.V., a Curaçao company, registration number 164650, registered at Schottegatweg Oost 10, Bon Bini Business Center. That comes straight from Memo's own Terms, not a review aggregator. Payments run through a separate Cyprus entity, IntellogixSoft Solutions Limited (HE 451682). Memo holds Curaçao Gaming Authority licence OGL/2024/1121/1020.

Across the network listings I checked, only two brands carry the IntellogixSoft name attached by name, rather than by resemblance: Kinghills Casino and Xtraspin Casino. Those are the two I am comfortable calling genuine sisters.

What "sister" buys you here, in practice, is depressingly consistent T&Cs. Expect the same restrictive furniture I found in Memo's own Terms: a dormant-account fee of €10 a month after 12 months of inactivity, balance confiscation after 30 months, a 3× deposit playthrough before any withdrawal, and wins over €10,000 throttled into monthly €10,000 installments. I have not deposited at Kinghills or Xtraspin myself, so treat that as a pattern to check clause-by-clause, not a guarantee - the family resemblance in offshore Curaçao networks is rarely skin-deep.

The blurred ring: shared platform, not proven owner

Then there is the wider group that keeps showing up on the same "related casinos" lists: Nine Casino, NineWin, Jokabet, CryptoLeo, BDMBet, BetOnRed and Wbetz. Matching design, matching bonus mechanics, matching processors. The temptation is to file them all under IntellogixSoft and move on.

I won't, and you shouldn't either. There is no operator-level document I could find that names IntellogixSoft as the owner of these seven. What connects them is the platform, and a shared platform is rented, not owned. A dozen unrelated operators can run on one white-label stack and end up looking identical to a player.

So the honest label for this ring is shared-platform, ownership unconfirmed. If a directory tells you Jokabet or CryptoLeo is "owned by the same company as Memo," ask where the registration number is. I could not source one.

Confirmed versus unconfirmed at a glance

Why the family tree matters for your money

Sister networks share more than a logo palette. They share the parts that decide whether you get paid.

The clearest signal comes from casino.guru's complaint data. In the snapshots I reviewed, Memo Casino carried 776 "black points", and every one was inherited from related casinos in its network, logged across three related-casino complaints, not from Memo directly. That is the whole point of tracking sisters. A brand with a clean-looking front page can be sitting on a pile of unresolved disputes filed against its cousins.

Memo's own casino.guru Safety Index tells a similar wobble: one April 2026 snapshot put it at 8.0 ("High"), and a later complaint-page snapshot dropped it to 6.3 ("below average"). Its T&Cs are rated "somewhat unfair." When the same platform stamps those Terms across five or six brands, the risk copies over with them.

The complaints are not abstract. One UK player reported depositing £8,500 into a casino in this orbit that falsely claimed UK regulation, and got back only £407 weeks later. Others report accounts disabled after depositing, and withdrawals that dragged on for a week or more. Whether that repeats brand-to-brand, I can't promise - but shared Terms plus a shared complaint pool is not a combination I would shrug off.

Are the sisters any safer than Memo?

Short answer: no reason to assume so, and a few reasons not to.

None of the confirmed or suspected sisters holds a UK Gambling Commission licence. None is connected to GAMSTOP. Curaçao licensing, which is what Memo runs on, does not give a UK player the ADR route, deposit-limit enforcement, or self-exclusion backstop the UKGC does. Switching from Memo to Kinghills or Nine Casino to "get away from the complaints" just moves you sideways onto the same rails.

Compared with a UKGC-licensed operator, every casino on this page sits in a weaker consumer-protection bracket. That is not a Memo-specific dig. It is the whole network.

Where the sister-site angle falls short

Three honest caveats before you use any of this as a shopping list.

Ownership is genuinely opaque. I can confirm Kinghills and Xtraspin by name and no further. The seven "blurred" brands may be same-owner, may be separate operators on one platform. I could not close that gap with a primary source, and anyone claiming certainty is overselling it.

The restrictive Terms travel with you. The dormant-account confiscation, the €10k-a-month payout ceiling, the FS win caps. If these clauses are the platform default, a sister site is not an escape hatch. You are re-signing the same contract under a new logo.

The complaint pool is shared, not diluted. Those 776 black points are a network figure. Picking a different brand in the same ring does not leave the disputes behind. If anything, it makes them harder to trace, because you are now dealing with whichever entity actually holds the licence for that specific site.

One more, for UK readers specifically. The UK is a Restricted Country in Memo's own Terms (clause 4.5), and there is no reason the sisters treat UK players any differently. Deposits from a restricted country have led to account closures and withheld withdrawals. Read that clause on any sister site before you fund an account.

How I checked this

I pulled the operator identity from Memo Casino's own Terms and About pages rather than trusting affiliate summaries, which is where the IntellogixSoft B.V. number (164650) and the Cyprus payments entity come from. For the network mapping, I only promoted a brand to "confirmed" when the operator name was attached to it directly. The 776 black points and the 6.3 Safety Index are casino.guru's published figures, cited as reported complaint evidence, not an endorsement. Where I could not find a primary source (most of the seven-brand ring), I have said so plainly.

Frequently asked questions